NAWBO-NYC

June 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          

« November 2007 | Main | February 2008 »

January 20, 2008

State of the State Address Fact Sheet: Paid Family Leave

“This year, I will ask again that you enact a paid family leave bill. It is unfair to ask hard
working New Yorkers to choose between economic security and caring for a loved family
member.”
-Governor Eliot Spitzer (January 9, 2008)

The Challenge

• Taking time from work in today’s economy may risk a family’s financial survival, while failing to provide care may risk the wellbeing of a young baby or ill parent.

• A mother with a newborn baby; a husband whose wife needs chemotherapy; a grown son whose elderly parent has just suffered a stroke – they must now choose between the financial security of their household and the urgent need to be with their families at these most vulnerable and critical moments of family life.

• This is an impossible choice, which is addressed, in part, with a family care benefit.

• California already has a similar system in place and Washington State just recently
passed it into law. 168 other countries also offer some form of paid family leave.

• Any bill must be careful to not overburden employers

Our Approach

• The Governor will once again submit legislation that fulfills the promise of the federal Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) by offering a modest benefit for up to 12 weeks for those employees that need to take off work to bond with a new child or care for a seriously ill family member.

• The Assembly passed this proposal last year.

• The bill would create a paid “family care benefit” for up to 12 weeks for parents to bond with a new child (biological, adoptive, foster) during the first year, and for people to care for a seriously ill parent, child, spouse, domestic partner, mother or father-in-law, or grandchild.

• To ensure this bill is sensitive to business concerns, it would increase the current 60¢ weekly cap on employee contribution, and allow employers to pass on to employees an additional 45¢ during the first year (our best projection using actuarial analysis as to the average cost of the benefit), and subsequently, a fixed amount determined annually by the Superintendent of Insurance based on his or her actuarially sound estimation of the average cost of the benefit. The same pass through will apply to those public employers that do not opt into TDI and choose to offer a separate family care benefit through SIF, self-insurance, or the private market.

• For more details, see the complete text of the bill (A9245).

Other Relevant Initiatives

• This Paid Family Leave proposal is a component of the Governor’s Economic Security Agenda, which includes among other initiatives already under way:

o Governor’s strategy to address New York’s foreclosure crisis (described in detail
in a separate fact sheet);
o Child Tax Credit initiative, which gives up to $1,000 to 49,000 families with
incomes of $30,000 or less to help pay for child care needs;
o Working Families Food Stamp Initiative, which will enroll an additional 100,000
working families into our food stamp program;
o Increased Labor Law enforcement through greater minimum wage enforcement
and the creation of the Misclassified Workers Task Force;
o Increased workers’ compensation benefits for the first time in fifteen years.
Despite a 20% cut in workers’ compensation rates, the maximum employee
benefits will rise from $400 to $600 by 2009, and will be indexed annually
thereafter; the minimum weekly benefit has also been increased from $40 to $100.

Download file.

January 7, 2008

SBA Ruling on Women-Owned Contracting Procedures

The latest ruling to the Women's Equity in Contracting Act of 2000 from the SBA leaves a lot to be desired. To learn more about the ruling, please review the press release issued by WIPP as well as the SBA press release.
WIPP Press Release
SBA Press Release

For full details on the proposed ruling, click here.

NAWBO NYC comments submitted to the SBA on the proposed ruling:

On behalf of the New York City chapter of the National Association of Women Business Owners (NAWBO-NYC) part of a national organization that represents the interests of 10.4 million women business owners, we are disappointed by the proposed SBA ruling. The ruling is a drastic step backwards in chipping away at the little progress that women made over the past seven years to gain a mere five percent of federal contracts, while half of all privately held companies have a woman owner. Women business owners are an important part of the economic fabric and rather than support women business owners, we feel that the SBA has delivered a lump of coal to women business owners. This proposed rule demonstrates that women business owners are not important to this administration or the political process.

Why we are disappointed with the Dec. 2000 SBA ruling:

1. In 1994, Congressional legislation mandated that five percent of government contracts go to women-owned businesses. To help meet this goal, a set-aside program for women-owned businesses was established in 2000. Currently, only three percent of federal contracts go to women-owned businesses.

2. The new SBA proposed rule will only allow federal agencies to implement the set-aside program for women owned businesses in four of over 2,300 business categories, and, even then, only after the agencies individually document that they previously discriminated against women owned businesses. If implemented consistent with the proposed rules, the set-aside program will do little if anything to increase the share of federal contracts that go to women-owned businesses.

3. If women business owners had received five percent (rather than three) of the $277.5 billion spent by the federal government with prime contractors in FY 2003, they would have received $13.68 billion in contracts. That's $4.9 billion more than they actually received. Meeting the five percent procurement goal will help women business owners achieve greater success.